Opinions: Dr. David Robinson blasts the economics of Maley Drive

“Technically, if the City burns money, even that adds to the GDP”

 

In a Press Release today, Laurentian Economics Dr. David Robinson blasted the economic understanding of the supporters of the Maley Drive Extension:

“There are so many errors in their thinking that it is embarrassing.” he claims. “I am including MP Marc Serré for saying that this project adds to the local GDP. That is a popular line. The Chamber of commerce uses it. It is also an error we teach Econ 101 students to avoid. It shows neither Marc nor the Chamber understands macroeconomic accounting,” said the economist. "They are actually counting a cost as a benefit,’’ said the economist. “Either very sneaky or very stupid.”

“Technically, if the City burns money, even that adds to the GDP,” said Robinson. “so in a simple-minded way, Marc and the Chamber are right. But if you burn money on a bad project you have to take it away from good projects. It is called opportunity cost in Econ 101. Moving money from good projects to bad projects has no effect on the GDP. Maley Drive will have no effect on GDP”

The city had a cost benefit study done. Robinson claims it was either incompetent or dishonest.

Northern Internet Solution

Robinson goes on to point out that the city hired AECOM to do the Environmental Assessment for Maley Drive. Then the city hired Tony Ceccuti away from AECOM to be general manager of infrastructure. Then Tony hired AECOM to do the cost benefit analysis. "Maybe the pool of brains is just too small,’’ he joked. “This incest with consultants seems to have given birth to a mental handicap in council.”

“The project is also fiscal disaster,” the economist said. “It will cost every man woman and child in the city $1000. It will generate almost no tax revenue”

“People should ask themselves if they want to pay $1000 for the project. Should their kids pay $1000 for the project.” Robinson says that the benefits go to very few. If you live south of Elm would you pay more than $100?. I wouldn’t. Councillors should be asking if the people who voted for them will get $1000 each in benefit from Maley. Some will lose as taxes go up and property values go down.”

“I won’t say anything about the effect on traffic,” said Robinson. I know there are serious questions, but I want to stick to the economics,’’

For further information, contact Dr. David Robinson, H 705, 566-4819 W 705-675-1151-3212 drobinson@laurentian.ca

Advertise Here B-r
Print
1 Comments
Rate this article:
5.0

Categories: Greater SuburyNumber of views: 1412

Tags: Maley DriveMaley Drive Extention

1 comments on article "Opinions: Dr. David Robinson blasts the economics of Maley Drive"

Avatar image

Norm

3/18/2016 9:47 PM

Reading this article does not enlighten in any way.....there is no informative facts, only inuendos of supposed higher thinking and knowing better......it is a head in the sand thinking that Sudbury is still between Falconbridge, Lasalle, Frood road and 69 South....people time is of value as well......if that is the little world the orchestrated opposition to the projects squeaky wheel approach is......they are correct as Maley would not be of value to them.........maybe we should 4 lane Bancroft and Howey drive to give us more east/West traffic flow.....would certainly resolve and fix the road in Minnow Lake.....but I digress......Maley is of value certainly to those who reside outside of the old Sudbury.....please take the time for a reality check and look at a map of what the boundaries of the new city is....Maley is a vision of what is to come......it is an investment in a greater Sudbury.... what is needed as the land between the previous city/towns and the old city of Sudbury will get built up.....I submit Maley is only a first new artery since the Kingsway followed by Lasalle......eventually there will be a need for Main Street in Val Caron and Keneth/69 North and Cote Blvd as East /West will be arteries...... and we have not started talking about more North South arteries. ......$1,000 please.....we have donated more than that in the outskirts to support the old infrastructure in Old Sudbury since amalgamation......and as far as this expense has to be paid by the next generation.....heck time the generations of entitlement find out how we built what is there now......in any case, we, the silver foxes will all be gone and not need it....they will, so yes they should pay for it.......and hopefully appreciate it as they move easily from East/West......rather than experience the congestion we all experienced prior to some excellent judgement and forward thinking decisions to modernize the Lasalle/Notre Dame intersection.......hey Lively, Rayside, Valley, Hanmer, Capreol, Garson etc.....isn't it grand to not wait lengthy amounts of time to get out of the city......not to mention all the people in my old neighbourhood of Miller/New Sudbury.......I could go on and on.......but I will trust that the visionaries, the forward thinkers will prevail......I do agree we need to fix what is broken.....borrow the money and let the future generation pay for what they use....as we did for many years....but build Maley too.....it will take some traffic away and your roads will last longer...........

Leave a comment

Add comment